Does your AI fall under the AI Act — and what must you do?
Map your AI systems and see, per system, the risk class, your obligations and the source from the legal text — no black box.
State of the regulation
One register — every AI system classified, with the source
Per system you instantly see the risk class and the obligations that follow, each traceable to the legal text. Below is an extensive, fictional example register.
Why this knowledge base?
AI regulation is moving faster than organisations can track. This knowledge base translates legislation, supervision and international policy developments into factual, verifiable information for boards, compliance teams and policymakers. No opinions, no hype: every claim is traceable to its primary source. Read how we work →
Are you AI Act ready?
Map your AI systems and find out in minutes which regime they fall under, where your gaps are and what your readiness score is — with references to the primary source.
See an example first → Build your own register
YRproject B.V. · Dutch CoC 97813974 · official sources only · no trackers, no third parties
Train your team in 45 minutes
Role-specific online course on the AI Act — with a test and certificate as evidence for your file. Kept current. From €49 p.p.
AI in the workplace (HR)
From recruitment and CV screening to evaluation, monitoring and payroll — see exactly which rules affect your people process: prohibited, high-risk, GDPR.
Transport & Logistics
A dedicated section for mobility, transport and logistics: all 15 EU regimes in one place (Data Act, eFTI, EMSWe, NIS2, CBAM, CSRD and more). Use the scan to find which affect your organisation — with a readiness score, deadlines and sources.
AI in financial services
From credit scoring and fraud detection to anti-money-laundering and pricing — see which rules affect your institution: high-risk, GDPR and DORA.
Our data in your system
Feed your own compliance tools, dashboards or AI assistant with our verified, daily-updated EU regulatory data — trilingual, with a source reference for every data point. A tailored connection, set up together.
Interactive: ask your question, scan your situation, track the changes
Beyond the articles, the knowledge base has three interactive tools — free and source-traceable.
Tools
Practical instruments to use right away.
- AI Act self-scan find out per system which rules affect you, with a readiness score
- HR self-scan which AI rules affect your recruitment, evaluation and people management
- Financial sector scan which AI rules affect your bank, insurer or financial service
- Transport & Logistics scan which EU rules (Data Act, eFTI, EMSWe, AI Act, NIS2) affect your transport or logistics organisation
- Deadline calendar (.ics) all AI Act deadlines in your own calendar — download or subscribe
- Glossary the key terms of the AI Act, explained briefly
- System register template a CSV to map your AI systems
- AI Act checklist a tick-list per regime, with the legal article
- Document library annotated register of the primary sources
Recently added
The Council of Europe AI Convention: the first binding AI treaty, ratified by the EU
The Council of Europe Framework Convention on AI is the first legally binding international AI treaty. The EU ratified it on 15 May 2026, after Parliament's consent on 11 March 2026. It binds states, not companies: principles and remedies that parties must transpose into national law.
Taiwan's AI Basic Act: a promotion-first framework law takes effect
On 14 January 2026 Taiwan's AI Basic Act took effect: a 20-article framework law setting seven governance principles and tasking the government, led by the National Science and Technology Council, with risk classification, data governance and worker protection.
How the ECB supervises AI in eurozone banks: technology-neutral, existing frameworks, a generative-AI focus
For the 2026-2028 cycle the ECB places AI under its operational-resilience priority, and in February 2026 two Supervisory Board members set out the stance: with 85%+ of supervised banks using AI, govern it within existing frameworks rather than new rules, with a sharper focus on generative AI.
IOSCO's AI supervisory toolkit for capital markets: a shared instrument for the world's securities regulators
On 25 May 2026 IOSCO published its final report "Supervisory Toolkit for AI Use in Capital Markets" (FR/02/2026): non-binding tools for securities supervisors across governance, third-party risk, disclosure and recordkeeping, covering the full AI lifecycle including GenAI and agentic AI.
Securing AI in critical infrastructure: where the AI Act, Cyber Resilience Act and NIS2 meet
A single AI system in a port often falls under three frameworks at once: the AI Act (Art. 15) secures the AI system itself, the Cyber Resilience Act the product, and NIS2 obliges the operator as an essential entity. This piece explains how they meet and who is responsible for what.
The UNESCO Recommendation on the Ethics of AI: the world's broadest AI standard, and why it is not a law
UNESCO's 2021 Recommendation on the Ethics of AI is the nearest thing to a universal AI standard — adopted by 193 states. It is non-binding but broad, resting on 11 policy areas and a Readiness Assessment used by 70+ countries. Its 4th Global Forum convenes in Riyadh on 14–17 September 2026.
The OECD turns its AI Principles into a checklist: Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible AI
In February 2026 the OECD published Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible AI — not a new set of principles, but a six-step process that translates its 2024 AI Principles and its 2023 Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises into concrete due diligence across the AI value chain.
Right to explanation of an AI decision: what Article 86 of the AI Act gives you
If you are affected by a decision based (in part) on a high-risk AI system, Article 86 of the AI Act gives you the right to a clear explanation of the AI system's role and the main elements of the decision — from the deployer, on top of your GDPR rights.
The UK's AI Growth Lab: a sandbox that launched before it has the power to bend any rule
On 8 June 2026 the UK launched its AI Growth Lab — a cross-economy regulatory sandbox, starting with legal services. But the version that went live is "advisory": it coordinates regulators and gives guidance, and cannot relax a single rule until Parliament passes the enabling law.
National supervisors: how AI Act enforcement is divided (the Dutch case)
The AI Act is largely enforced nationally. In the Netherlands a draft Implementation Act (consultation 20 April–1 June 2026) gives the AP and RDI a coordinating role over ten existing market surveillance authorities, with the AFM and DNB supervising the financial sector.
Washington conditions its AI purchases on viewpoint — the Unbiased AI Principles take effect in 2026
From 11 March 2026 every US federal agency must write two "Unbiased AI Principles" — truth-seeking and ideological neutrality — into its contracts for large language models. OMB Memorandum M-26-04 implements Executive Order 14319; non-compliant vendors face termination for default.
Provider or deployer in HR AI: who is what?
In HR AI the builder of the ATS or HR tech is usually the provider and the employer the deployer. But an employer can become a provider itself through own branding or substantial modification (Art. 25). The role determines which duties apply.
New here? Start with the overview: the state of AI regulation.