AI Regulatory Intelligence โ€” by YRproject

factual analysis · traceable to primary sources

Explainer

AI in evaluation, promotion and dismissal: high-risk beyond hiring

Adopted 2026-06-21 ยท ≈ 2 min read ยท Dirk Baaijen

Annex III of the AI Act goes beyond recruitment: AI that helps decide on working conditions, promotion, termination, task allocation and performance evaluation is high-risk too. That catches performance tools and workforce systems many employers already use.

Short answer: Recruitment gets the most attention, but Annex III of the AI Act goes further. AI that helps decide on working conditions, promotion, termination, task allocation and performance evaluation is high-risk too. That brings performance dashboards, productivity scores and workforce-management systems many employers already run under the same heavy regime โ€” with the GDPR on top.

What falls under Annex III

The regulation explicitly names AI systems used to make or influence decisions on:

  • working conditions, promotion and termination of an employment relationship;
  • the allocation of tasks based on behaviour or personal traits;
  • monitoring and evaluating the performance and behaviour of workers.

It does not matter whether the system decides itself or "merely" makes a recommendation a manager adopts: decision support is caught too.

The employer's duties

As deployer (Art. 26) the same core duties apply as in recruitment:

  • Human oversight (Art. 14): a human assesses and can set aside the outcome โ€” no algorithm may demote or dismiss anyone unchecked.
  • Inform the affected workers (and where applicable their representatives) that a high-risk system is used.
  • Relevant, representative input data and monitoring for skewed outcomes.
  • Certain employers must first carry out a fundamental-rights assessment (FRIA).

The GDPR: Article 22 for heavy decisions

Dismissal, a refused promotion or a sanction are decisions with significant effects. Where such a decision comes solely from an automated process, Article 22 GDPR applies: a valid basis, transparency and a right to human intervention. In practice this means an AI judgement may never be the last word.

The trap: monitoring that quietly decides

Many monitoring tools not only collect data but turn it into scores that drive promotions and reviews. At that point "measuring" shifts to "deciding" โ€” and thus into high-risk. The line is not the technology but the use.

What to do

  • Inventory your performance, planning and workforce systems, not just your recruitment tools.
  • Determine per system whether it makes or influences decisions about people.
  • Secure a human final judgement for every consequence to an individual.
  • Document the logic and keep logs โ€” you need them in a complaint or supervisory request.

The AI Act protects the whole employment relationship, not just the front door. Getting only recruitment right covers half the risk.

Sources

  1. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj
    Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (AI Act): Annex III covers decisions on working conditions, promotion, termination, task allocation and performance evaluation.
  2. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj
    Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR): Art. 22 for decisions with significant effects, such as dismissal or demotion.

Share on LinkedIn

Read next

U

Algorithmic management: AI that allocates and steers work, beyond platform work

Algorithmic management โ€” AI that allocates tasks, steers performance and nudges behaviour โ€” is not limited to delivery platforms. In ordinary organisations it falls under Annex III (task allocation, evaluation) and the GDPR, with human oversight and transparency at its core.

A

AI in onboarding and internal mobility: where is the line?

Talent marketplaces, skills matching and career paths with AI seem neutral, but they reach the high-risk line as soon as they steer promotion or progression decisions (Annex III, point 4). Then the AI Act, GDPR, transparency and equal opportunity apply internally too.

U

AI in scheduling, planning and payroll: task allocation is high-risk

AI that assigns shifts, plans capacity or calculates pay falls under Annex III once it allocates tasks based on behaviour or traits. Beyond the AI Act, working-time rules, schedule predictability and the GDPR apply โ€” plus the risk that dynamic scheduling disadvantages certain groups.

Dirk Baaijen

About this knowledge base

Compiled and maintained by YRproject โ€” programme and project direction at the intersection of digital transformation, AI and regulation. Every factual claim is traceable to its primary source. YRproject is led by Dirk Baaijen About & method โ†’

A project or programme? Work with YRproject โ†’

The monthly briefing

AI regulation in five minutes: what changed, what is coming and what it means. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Your address is used for this only and stored on our own servers.